<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/">
  <channel>
    <title>platforms &amp;mdash; writing.as.amit</title>
    <link>https://am1t.writeas.com/tag:platforms</link>
    <description>Musings, in all sizes</description>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2026 15:31:30 +0000</pubDate>
    
    <item>
      <title>The software that I use is generally not a conventional option.</title>
      <link>https://am1t.writeas.com/the-software-that-i-use-is-generally-not-a-conventional-option?pk_campaign=rss-feed</link>
      <description>&lt;![CDATA[The software that I use is generally not a conventional option. I don&#39;t subscribe to the established #platforms. I either find them miserably dull or overly shiny for my liking. It helps that I know deep down that I am supporting a new and upcoming player for whom my business is worth. It means something; I mean something as one more customer. Not &#34;just another customer&#34;.&#xA;&#xA;This also means that often the software is not fully baked. Some essential features are missing, or there are bugs around corner cases. I am an early adopter who pays more and still works as a tester. Sometimes, I get frustrated and switch to the popular option only to get out and back soon.&#xA;&#xA;It is ok for me if you don&#39;t have all the features, but deliver whatever you do differently. Have an identity. Stand out.]]&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The software that I use is generally not a conventional option. I don&#39;t subscribe to the established <a href="https://am1t.writeas.com/tag:platforms" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">platforms</span></a>. I either find them miserably dull or overly shiny for my liking. It helps that I know deep down that I am supporting a new and upcoming player for whom my business is worth. It means something; <em>I</em> mean something as one more customer. Not “just another customer”.</p>

<p>This also means that often the software is not fully baked. Some essential features are missing, or there are bugs around corner cases. I am an early adopter who pays more and still works as a tester. Sometimes, I get frustrated and switch to the popular option only to get out and back soon.</p>

<p>It is ok for me if you don&#39;t have all the features, but deliver whatever you do differently. Have an identity. Stand out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <guid>https://am1t.writeas.com/the-software-that-i-use-is-generally-not-a-conventional-option</guid>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Feb 2023 17:37:38 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Story of two writing interfaces</title>
      <link>https://am1t.writeas.com/story-of-two-writing-interfaces?pk_campaign=rss-feed</link>
      <description>&lt;![CDATA[I love the writing interface for write.as platform. No-nonsense. It does what it is supposed to do. Plus, all the other options, though available, get out of the way while I write. Grammarly works as expected. The posts are auto-saved in an intelligent way. At the same time, I can also build a list of drafts while working on them. The word count is visible, not the character count, as with Micro.blog that hosts my main website.&#xA;&#xA;That last point tells you about the priority of these two #platforms that are very similar, yet different in many ways. Micro.blog compares itself to Twitter; hence considers itself closer to microblogging (well, it&#39;s in the name). So the writing interface looks similar to the one on Twitter. Or, for that matter, most social media platforms. A bare text box that accepts Markdown text. &#xA;&#xA;Write.as, on the other hand, calls itself &#34;a place for focused writing&#34;. This shows with the editor. Every time I use it, I want to write long. I can&#39;t say the same for the text box that Micro.blog provides. It&#39;s suitable only for microblogging.&#xA;&#xA;Sure. Given the platform&#39;s well-supported APIs, a list of clients already supports publishing to Micro.blog. So this is not an issue that many may face. However, most are only written for the Apple ecosystem, something I am not part of.  &#xA;&#xA;I love almost everything about Micro.blog. But I hate its writing interface and love the one provided by write.as. No surprise, then, that I am publishing most of my thoughts here. &#xA;&#xA;This leaves me very confused. Which is my primary platform?]]&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I love the writing interface for write.as platform. No-nonsense. It does what it is supposed to do. Plus, all the other options, though available, get out of the way while I write. Grammarly works as expected. The posts are auto-saved in an intelligent way. At the same time, I can also build a list of drafts while working on them. The word count is visible, not the character count, as with Micro.blog that hosts my main website.</p>

<p>That last point tells you about the priority of these two <a href="https://am1t.writeas.com/tag:platforms" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">platforms</span></a> that are very similar, yet different in many ways. Micro.blog compares itself to Twitter; hence considers itself closer to microblogging (well, <em>it&#39;s in the name</em>). So the writing interface looks similar to the one on Twitter. Or, for that matter, most social media platforms. A bare text box that accepts Markdown text.</p>

<p>Write.as, on the other hand, calls itself “a place for focused writing”. This shows with the editor. Every time I use it, I want to write long. I can&#39;t say the same for the text box that Micro.blog provides. It&#39;s suitable only for microblogging.</p>

<p>Sure. Given the platform&#39;s well-supported APIs, a list of clients already supports publishing to Micro.blog. So this is not an issue that many may face. However, most are only written for the Apple ecosystem, something I am not part of.</p>

<p>I <a href="https://am1t.writeas.com/i-am-recently-pretty-inspired-by-the-concept-of-wiki-or-digitalgarden" rel="nofollow">love almost everything</a> about Micro.blog. But I <a href="https://www.amitgawande.com/2022/08/21/i-wonder-if.html" rel="nofollow">hate its writing interface</a> and love the one provided by write.as. No surprise, then, that I am publishing most of my thoughts here.</p>

<p>This leaves me very confused. Which is my primary platform?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <guid>https://am1t.writeas.com/story-of-two-writing-interfaces</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 11 Feb 2023 14:33:41 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Drafts with Write.as</title>
      <link>https://am1t.writeas.com/drafts-with-write-as?pk_campaign=rss-feed</link>
      <description>&lt;![CDATA[I wasn&#39;t aware that there&#39;s a way to create drafts with Write.as. With no option in the editor to save a post in-works as draft, I always thought it wasn&#39;t possible. I should read a bit first before deciding on what I know. In fairness, though, the workflow is different, slightly reverse from all other #platforms. You basically publish a post and expect it to be a draft as it was done anonymously.&#xA;&#xA;Anyway, every time I access Write.as, everything looks too fragmented to me. I land on a page which is a blank one with a blinking cursor. Brilliant! But what next? There&#39;s nothing else if you don&#39;t know where to go. I can see my blog posts, edit them. Do you want the community? There is a different product. Pictures you say? That&#39;s another different product.&#xA;&#xA;For example, I still wonder how do I add an image here? Can I? Or is the image&#39;s workflow separate? Possibly, it is part of the Rich editor available as a Pro feature?&#xA;&#xA;All said, this is a nice editor.]]&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#39;t aware that there&#39;s a way to create drafts with Write.as. With no option in the editor to save a post in-works as draft, I always thought it wasn&#39;t possible. I should read a bit first before deciding on what I know. In fairness, though, the workflow is different, slightly reverse from all other <a href="https://am1t.writeas.com/tag:platforms" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">platforms</span></a>. You basically publish a post and expect it to be a draft as it was done anonymously.</p>

<p>Anyway, every time I access Write.as, everything looks too fragmented to me. I land on a page which is a blank one with a blinking cursor. Brilliant! But what next? There&#39;s nothing else if you don&#39;t know where to go. I can see my blog posts, edit them. <em>Do you want the community?</em> There is a different product. <em>Pictures you say?</em> That&#39;s another different product.</p>

<p>For example, I still wonder how do I add an image here? Can I? Or is the image&#39;s workflow separate? Possibly, it is part of the Rich editor available as a Pro feature?</p>

<p>All said, this is a nice editor.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <guid>https://am1t.writeas.com/drafts-with-write-as</guid>
      <pubDate>Fri, 11 Feb 2022 13:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Blogs have made the web boring</title>
      <link>https://am1t.writeas.com/blogs-have-made-the-web-boring?pk_campaign=rss-feed</link>
      <description>&lt;![CDATA[There is something wonderful about a clean writing and reading interface. I am always a big fan of #platforms that build themselves on clean interfaces. It helps. Does it mean there is no place for flashy sites? Absolutely not.&#xA;&#xA;I have come to a realization recently. Blogs have made web boring. Think about it. Every blog looks the same. All themes are more or less the same. A slight layout change here. A margin or padding there. Varied columns. But all look the same to me. You know that you are reading a blog.&#xA;&#xA;Imagine if every page was custom. Well, let me help you. Check this site by Aegir. No, don&#39;t just look at the homepage. Look at every post. Each post has different design. What brilliance! I am absolutely impressed and saddened at the same time. And jealous too. I wish I could create something like this. I can&#39;t. &#xA;&#xA;Well, why can&#39;t I? I mean, why can&#39;t I just create html pages? Isn&#39;t that the first line of code I wrote?]]&gt;</description>
      <content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is something wonderful about a clean writing and reading interface. I am always a big fan of <a href="https://am1t.writeas.com/tag:platforms" class="hashtag" rel="nofollow"><span>#</span><span class="p-category">platforms</span></a> that build themselves on clean interfaces. It helps. Does it mean there is no place for flashy sites? Absolutely not.</p>

<p>I have come to a realization recently. Blogs have made web boring. Think about it. Every blog looks the same. All themes are more or less the same. A slight layout change here. A margin or padding there. Varied columns. But all look the same to me. You know that <em>you are reading a blog</em>.</p>

<p>Imagine if every page was custom. Well, let me help you. Check <a href="http://aegir.org" rel="nofollow">this site by Aegir</a>. No, don&#39;t just look at the homepage. Look at every post. Each post has different design. What brilliance! I am absolutely impressed and saddened at the same time. And jealous too. I wish I could create something like this. I can&#39;t.</p>

<p>Well, why can&#39;t I? I mean, why can&#39;t I just create <code>html</code> pages? Isn&#39;t that the first line of code I wrote?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
      <guid>https://am1t.writeas.com/blogs-have-made-the-web-boring</guid>
      <pubDate>Sat, 01 Jan 2022 16:31:03 +0000</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>